Physician to Physician Discussions > Let's talk results
I know that Co2 fraxels goes deeper, some much deeper, than most CO2 resurfacing. Wrinkles, scars improvements may depend on depth.
You missed old fashioned dermabrasion.
lasered
Judging by the results we have seen thus far, coverage definately plays a greater role is dramatic results than depth. Particularly in aging related changes.
Simon
Judging by the results we have seen thus far, coverage definately plays a greater role is dramatic results than depth. Particularly in aging related changes.
Simon
Judging by the results we have seen thus far, coverage definately plays a greater role is dramatic results than depth. Particularly in aging related changes.
Simon
Judging by the results we have seen thus far, coverage definately plays a greater role is dramatic results than depth. Particularly in aging related changes.
Simon
Judging by the results we have seen thus far, coverage definately plays a greater role is dramatic results than depth. Particularly in aging related changes.
Simon
people use this website to hurt other peoples business, jealous, childish, mean and self centered - you know who you are - get a life
Med Spam
people use this website to hurt other peoples business, jealous, childish, mean and self centered - you know who you are - get a life
Med Spam
So downtime aside, what is your opinion about the results that different resurfacing modalities are capable of?
If I were to place them in order I would say:
C02 >>> Plasma >>> Erbium >>> Fractional C02 >>> Fractional Erbium >>> Pearl
Not getting caught up in the hype of fractional lasers, they will never measure up to true ablative treatments imo.
Any takers?